Saturday, May 21, 2011

Are the Philidelphia police sending a message?

It could certainly be perceived as such.

With a shocking altercation between Philadelphia police and a 25-year-old IT worker putting the spotlight back on open-carry gun laws, local authorities are warning gun owners that they will be "inconvenienced" if they carry unconcealed handguns in the city.

Lt. Raymond Evers, a spokesman for the city police, told FoxNews.com that gun owners who open carry, which is legal in the city, may be asked to lay on the ground until officers feel safe while they check permits.


I have to admit being curious about just how safe the officers in Philidelphia want to feel. Perhaps they would all like to have armored vehicles to ride in? I mean, "Philadelphia, in certain areas, is very dangerous," according to Evers.

Seems to be that way for the law-abiding as well.

However...

We should also recognize the police officer who is doing it right.

Mint Hill police saved the life of Bill Williamson when he collapsed in his front yard.

They used an automatic external defibrillator to get his heart started again.

Cpl. Christopher Hunt of the Mint Hill, NC Police was honored by his chief with a Lifesaving Award. Good for him.


Yet again...

And people want to know why I don't trust the police...

"Defendant further admits that Trooper Young did not have a lawful reason for stopping Plaintiff's vehicle on I-95, and that Trooper Young's reasons for stopping the vehicle and arresting Plaintiff were purely personal in nature, and Young was acting outside the course and scope of her authority as a trooper," Assistant Attorney General Dahr Joseph Tanoury wrote in a motion to the commission.

Yet Trooper Stephanie Young retains her law enforcement certificate and her job as an NC State Trooper.

I don't trust them because they aren't accountable for their actions, either when it's an honest mistake or with malice. Especially when it's with malice.

Friday, May 20, 2011

The Pima County Sheriff is defensive

(Via the Drudge Report)

Of course, if I were a sheriff, and my officers shot an Iraq war veteran 60 times and could find nothing illegal in his home, I might be a bit defensive too.

Keep the pressure on, folks.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

In which Caleb says we're wrong

(Via Say Uncle)

And where I say, not so much.

It's been way too long around here without discussing the Gun Thing. A post at Gun Nutz in which Caleb is "imploring people to resist the temptation to run out and buy the latest trend in gun stuff, the pocket 9mm as exemplified by the Ruger LC9 and the Sig P290. It seems now that the word has been heard by others and they too are picking up their drums to implore people to not buy guns based on marketing" has me motivated to end that.

Caleb's POV on this is that "We’ve said it here before – there is nothing you can do with a “pocket” 9mm that you can’t do better with a legit subcompact gun or a proper pocket pistol in a mousegun caliber." His point being, I believe, that because the 9mm gun is physically small, it's too hard to handle in 9mm, so stick with the smaller caliber so it will be easier to handle. Besides, it's almost as effective, and we can prove it because a .380 penetrates ballistic gel 11-12".

I'm sorry, but my reaction to this (outside of a sincere "whiskey tango foxtrot, over?") is twofold. First, Caleb is correct in urging people not to buy a pocket 9mm (and I extend that to "any gun at all") because of marketing. I didn't buy my preferred carry gun, a Kel-Tec PF9, because of marketing. This is a Good Thing, because Kel-Tec pretty much sucks at marketing.

I bought it because, as Caleb says, a .380 with the best self-defense ammo you can buy is "just about enough gun". Note that "just about enough gun" does not now and never shall equal "enough gun". A 9mm with a good mass-market self-defense ammo (in my case, the Federal Hydrashok) leaves me feeling that I have "enough gun".

Second, I am not going to buy that you can't control a compact 9mm well enough to make 25 yard shots. You can; I can do it. It's a matter of duplicating the route to Carnegie Hall--practice, practice, practice. This is also how you learn to control any small pistol. Or, for that matter, any other gun.

I will admit to not being a pistol person. I grew up shooting long guns, and my preference in self defense guns for everyday carry would be an M4gery with a couple of spare 20 round Pmags. Unfortunately for me, that kind of takes the whole open carry debate to new heights that I don't care to go to. And while I luvs me some 1911s in .45 ACP and some XDs in 9mm, when the uniform of the day is shorts, a t-shirt and flip-flops, they just don't work for me as a carry piece. (And so help me, I will drop the Ban Hammer on the first person who tells me that I need to adjust my dress to suit the "right gun".)

But folks, with a bit of training this old Long Gun Guy can take his bitty PF9 and pop 25 yard torso targets with combat-effective shots at 25 yards until he can't keep a grip on that bitty PF9 any longer--call it 100 rounds, if I'm not in a masochistic mood. If I can do that, I have to think anyone who has average hand-eye coordination and is cross-eye dominant can do it as well.

This is a self-defense gun, meant to be used in a hurry when you have way too many hormones dumping into your bloodstream in way too short a time. I'm not trying for a 2" group, I just want to make Mr. Bad Guy stop what's he's doing and assume a horizontal position.

And somehow, I just don't trust a .380, no matter how wonderful the ammo is, to do that. So I'm sticking with my compact 9mm. My suggestion is to follow my methodology--get a gun, in the largest caliber possible, that you can shoot with accuracy and comfortably carry all the time. That way, you're much more likely to have it when you need it, which is, after all, the real first rule of a gunfight.

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

URK!?

(Via FOXNews)

Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocolypse

From the Centers for Disease Control?

Where are all those gunboard threads on "What gun for zombies?" when you need 'em?

Monday, May 16, 2011

Um-m-m, maybe not so much

While the situation at Fukushima is not great, it is not "OMG RUN FOR THE HILLS WE'RE ALL GONNA GLOW!!!" The damage is contained, the core (such as it now is) is cooled and the cleanup (or more likely, encapsulation) can begin. There are water leaks to be tracked and a huge amount of contamination to assess and deal with. But end of the world has been postponed--indefinitely.

Invaluable lessons will be learned and incorporated into the next generation of plants, and probably retrofitted into existing plants as far as possible. At least it will work this way overseas; here in the US I fear we'll all freeze in the dark before we allow more nukes to be built.

Sorry to disappoint you, econutz. Better luck next time.